Fourth, a weak "reverse return". Why? Because it was a "third" and not only. Under the impact, I understand such things – as a commentary on the development of topic, discussion, etc. has long been observed more posts – less comments, posts lower – more comments. Here, in general, everything is banal, simply publish very quickly lose relevance. How can I count on a lot of comments, if the news is already in day of its publication, flies in the deep archive? Reader, Newbie on the blog, according to the most current "top" position is that, buried below – not the first freshness, everything is already spend too much time for new information. Fifth, you can quickly fizzle out. If you work in this mode, it is quite probable "crisis of ideas." As a rule, are becoming wildly, then after a while, if you write very often, there are problems that are, complete end disappointment and the closure of the project.
You can think of more points, but I think this will be enough for a verdict. In fact, this option is more search engine and other services to ping when you publish each new fasting, but not for men. So, of course, not always, there are a lot of cool and outstanding bloggers who write 2-3 times a day, with decent quality, but then, they are outstanding, that protrude from the bulk of their kind. And, remember my post Experts against journalists, and so, frequent posting is inherent in the first place "journalists." Now, a rare posting. For me it's 02/01 post a week or less. Like the "common", has its advantages and disadvantages. Plays first option in the struggle for the sympathy of search engines, but, but theoretically more preferable for the reader. Especially if every office masterpiece that is "rarely, pointedly." Such publications will always be waiting, and it is unlikely someone otpishetsya of RSS.
Rare posting, lets focus on quality, this is a great option for an "expert" with all its attendant benefits – a large number of comments, the grateful readers and subscribers, the idea is certainly not transferred, but the time for the project can pay less. However, this option is one problem – this is a luxury accessible not to everyone. Try to write one post a month at first. I am sure the outcome of your two month activities will be 2-4 rss-subscriber. Therefore, as for me, the second option is preferable, but it still needs to crawl. My opinion, at first, it is desirable to write a post per day. You can certainly make a 2.1 output, but it is desirable to compensate by posting in one day a couple of posts. And, as you can write better. Publications – is the capital and you need the original accumulation. Then, with the development of the blog, gradually, we can reduce the number of positions, giving more time to quality. Yes, and the author will be gradually more and more match the status of "Expert" that will allow this luxury. Another read: All About Blogger
During the investigation of mail fraud in the Netherlands, the police faced a curious fact – unknown buyer paid 25 thousand euros for the Nokia 1100. (Similarly see: 
Not logged in 
